[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154161726247.88331.15629902810537417880@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:01:02 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...ux.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] clk: imx: add SCCG PLL type
Quoting Abel Vesa (2018-11-07 03:54:45)
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:55:52PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Abel Vesa (2018-09-24 03:39:55)
> > > +static unsigned long clk_pll2_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > > + unsigned long parent_rate)
> > > +{
> > > + struct clk_sccg_pll *pll = to_clk_sccg_pll(hw);
> > > + u32 val, ref, divr1, divf1, divr2, divf2;
> > > + u64 temp64;
> > > +
> > > + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG0);
> > > + switch (FIELD_GET(PLL_REF_MASK, val)) {
> > > + case 0:
> > > + ref = OSC_25M;
> > > + break;
> > > + case 1:
> > > + ref = OSC_27M;
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + ref = OSC_25M;
> >
> > Does this information not come through 'parent_rate'?
> >
>
> No. So basically both pll1 and pll2 and the divider after it form together this SCCG:
>
> https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/IMX8MDQLQRM.pdf#page=834
>
> See: Figure 5-8. SSCG PLL Block Diagram
Thanks for the link!
>
> We're basically reading the input of the pll 1 in order to compute the output of the entire SCCG.
>
> I know it's a mess. I'm working on cleaning it up, but for now we need this in in order to boot up.
What's the plan to clean it up?
>
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + val = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_CFG2);
> > > + divr1 = FIELD_GET(PLL_DIVR1_MASK, val);
> > > + divr2 = FIELD_GET(PLL_DIVR2_MASK, val);
> > > + divf1 = FIELD_GET(PLL_DIVF1_MASK, val);
> > > + divf2 = FIELD_GET(PLL_DIVF2_MASK, val);
> > > +
> > > + temp64 = ref * 2;
> > > + temp64 *= (divf1 + 1) * (divf2 + 1);
> > > +
> > > + do_div(temp64, (divr1 + 1) * (divr2 + 1));
> >
> > Nitpicks: A comment with the equation may be helpful to newcomers.
>
> Since the SCCG is contructed by multiple different types of clocks here, the equation doesn't help
> since it is spread in all constructing blocks.
Ok.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists