linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/24] leds: lt3593: Use led_compose

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42d68eae-6905-e787-3797-f0f16b0dfb84@zonque.org>
Date:   Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:37:52 +0100
From:   Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pavel@....cz, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] leds: lt3593: Use led_compose_name()

On 6/11/2018 11:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Switch to using generic LED support for composing LED class
> device name.

Thanks for the rework!

> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c
> index de3623e..d005abc 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lt3593.c
> @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <uapi/linux/uleds.h>
> +
> +#define LED_LT3593_NAME "lt3593"
>   
>   struct lt3593_led_data {
> -	char name[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE];
>   	struct led_classdev cdev;
>   	struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
>   };
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ static int lt3593_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	struct fwnode_handle *child;
>   	int ret, state = LEDS_GPIO_DEFSTATE_OFF;
>   	enum gpiod_flags flags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
> +	struct led_init_data init_data;
>   	const char *tmp;
>   
>   	if (dev_get_platdata(dev)) {
> @@ -138,14 +139,11 @@ static int lt3593_led_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		return PTR_ERR(led_data->gpiod);
>   
>   	child = device_get_next_child_node(dev, NULL);
> +	init_data.fwnode = child;

Not quite following. `fwnode' is the only member of that struct that is 
initialized?

>   
> -	ret = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &tmp);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		snprintf(led_data->name, sizeof(led_data->name),
> -			 "lt3593::");
> -	else
> -		snprintf(led_data->name, sizeof(led_data->name),
> -			 "lt3593:%s", tmp);
> +	ret = led_compose_name(child, LED_LT3593_NAME, ":", init_data.name);

... and here, a member that wasn't written before is used? What am I 
missing?


Thanks,
Daniel