[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <655c9c3f-fd53-f932-64fd-cd9fa4d1168c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 16:38:12 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] ipc: Add a cyclic mode for id generation
On 11/06/2018 08:02 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 10:43:46AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The idea of using the cyclic mode to reduce id reuse came from Manfred
>> Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>. There may be a little bit of
>> additional memory/performance overhead in doing cyclic id allocation,
>> but it is a slow path anyway and a bit of overhead shouldn't be an issue.
>>
>> This patch differs from his as the cyclic mode is not the default and
>> has to be explicitly opted in for users who want that.
> I really don't like the "make the sysadmin choose" approach. It's
> shifting blame to someone who has no idea what the tradeoffs are.
> We should try to get it right rather than force more people to learn
> why we're incapable of making the right decision for them.
>
My patch is conservative as there will be no behavior change by default.
I won't mind changing the default to cyclic if we all agree.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists