linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.18 23/34] block: dont deal with discard limit in blkdev_issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181108215140.348449135@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  8 Nov 2018 13:52:52 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>,
        Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@...el.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 23/34] block: dont deal with discard limit in blkdev_issue_discard()

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>

commit 744889b7cbb56a64f957e65ade7cb65fe3f35714 upstream.

blk_queue_split() does respect this limit via bio splitting, so no
need to do that in blkdev_issue_discard(), then we can align to
normal bio submit(bio_add_page() & submit_bio()).

More importantly, this patch fixes one issue introduced in a22c4d7e34402cc
("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks"), in which
zero discard bio may be generated in case of zero alignment.

Fixes: a22c4d7e34402ccdf3 ("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 block/blk-lib.c |   28 ++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -29,9 +29,7 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
-	unsigned int granularity;
 	unsigned int op;
-	int alignment;
 	sector_t bs_mask;
 
 	if (!q)
@@ -54,38 +52,16 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_
 	if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
-	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
-	alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
-
 	while (nr_sects) {
-		unsigned int req_sects;
-		sector_t end_sect, tmp;
+		unsigned int req_sects = nr_sects;
+		sector_t end_sect;
 
-		/*
-		 * Issue in chunks of the user defined max discard setting,
-		 * ensuring that bi_size doesn't overflow
-		 */
-		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects,
-					q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
 		if (!req_sects)
 			goto fail;
 		if (req_sects > UINT_MAX >> 9)
 			req_sects = UINT_MAX >> 9;
 
-		/*
-		 * If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
-		 * misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
-		 */
 		end_sect = sector + req_sects;
-		tmp = end_sect;
-		if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
-		    sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
-			end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
-			sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
-			end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
-			req_sects = end_sect - sector;
-		}
 
 		bio = next_bio(bio, 0, gfp_mask);
 		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;