[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154166792021.10655.6752271937511795324.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:05:20 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: miklos@...redi.hu, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] fuse: Kill fasync only if interrupt is queued in
queue_interrupt()
We should sent signal only in case of interrupt is really queued.
Not a real problem, but this makes the code clearer and intuitive.
v2: Move kill_fasync() under fiq->waitq.lock
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index ae813e609932..1ecec7fcb841 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -476,9 +476,9 @@ static void queue_interrupt(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq, struct fuse_req *req)
if (list_empty(&req->intr_entry)) {
list_add_tail(&req->intr_entry, &fiq->interrupts);
wake_up_locked(&fiq->waitq);
+ kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
}
spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
- kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
}
static void request_wait_answer(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists