[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1541668616-9229-1-git-send-email-suraj1998@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:46:56 +0530
From: Suraj Singh <suraj1998@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suraj1998@...il.com, Suraj Singh <suraj998@...il.com>
Subject: Re: net: ipv4: tcp_westwood: fixed warnings and checks
From: Suraj Singh <suraj998@...il.com>
Regrding why I used "staging: " in the commmit message, I was following Greg Kroah-Hartman's video on YouTube on how to submit your first patch, and in his sample commit, he'd started his commit message with "staging: ", and so I thought it was convention to do so. I'll remove that immediately. I made this same mistake in another patch that I just sent for TCP Vegas, I'll make the change there as well.
I didn't consider the complexities of calling the same function twice. I was looking more towards satisying the scriptpatch.pl's requirements.
- tp->snd_cwnd = tp->snd_ssthresh = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);
+ tp->snd_cwnd = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);
+ tp->snd_ssthresh = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);
I've made the same mistake here. I'll make these changes and resubmit. Is there anything else that's wrong?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists