linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181108111105.GC13195@uranus.lan>
Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:11:05 +0300
From:   Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:     Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 08:41:46AM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> >
> > As to me -- yes, I would move zero page testing to a separate memory testcase.
> > But since Alexey is the former author of the tests better wait for his opinion.
> 
> Alexey,
> 
> would you care if we turn those 2 tests into 1, taking care of the
> zero page testing elsewhere ? Would you mind if I send out a patch for
> that ?

Rafael, just make it so. While we preserve old functionality
I think it is fine.

	Cyrill