linux-kernel - Re: [TECH TOPIC] SoC maintainer group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:00:17 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        ksummit <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>, rmk@...linux.org.uk,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [TECH TOPIC] SoC maintainer group

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 12:17:23PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:

> Could the poeple listed on this list please list potential schedule conflicts?

> I'm going to assume we should avoid: Andriod uConf, RISC-V uConf,
> Device Tree uConf.  What are other potential conflicts.  I'm going to
> guess this might be "interesting" to schedule.  :-)

The clang BoFs, RT and testing would be bad for me.  Possibly some other
stuff but I've not seen the schedule yet.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)