[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d57ace5e-d42a-0a0e-2813-4a25cc6b37bb@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:58:15 +0530
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Strashko, Grygorii" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for i2c-omap driver
On 08/11/18 2:53 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:49:31PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:
>> Add separate entry for i2c-omap and add my name as reviewer for this
>> driver.
>
> Thanks for stepping up, yet out of curiosity: why not maintainer?
>
I wasn't sure whether the convention is to add Reviewer or Maintainer
entry for individual driver. I would be glad to change entry to maintainer.
--
Regards
Vignesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists