[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86d16e39-15df-c12c-7bf3-25996db0c3a9@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:58:45 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
CC: <marek.vasut@...il.com>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
<computersforpeace@...il.com>, <richard@....at>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>, <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: add restriction for nmaps in smpt
parser
On 11/08/2018 02:54 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:07:11 +0000
> <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
>> The map selector is limited to a maximum of 8 bits, allowing
>> for a maximum of 256 possible map configurations. The total
>> number of map configurations should be addressable by the
>> total number of bits described by the detection commands.
>>
>> For example: if there are five to eight possible sector map
>> configurations, at least three configuration detection commands
>> will be needed to extract three bits of configuration selection
>> information from the device in order to identify which configuration
>> is currently in use.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
>
> I don't remember suggesting this :-).
I see this when you discussed with Yogesh:
+ for (nmaps = 0; i< smpt_len; nmaps++) {
+ if(!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) {
+ i += 2;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if(!map_id_is_valid) {
+ if (nmaps) {
+ ret = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
If I understand correctly, you meant that if there are no detection commands,
and more than a configuration map, then return an error.
This is correct in my opinion. What I did was to generalize this idea. If smtp
defines more maps than you can select using detection commands, return error.
+
+ ret = smpt+i;
+ } else if (map_id == SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i])) {
+ ret = smpt+i;
+ break;
+ }
+
/* increment the table index to the next map */
i += SMPT_MAP_REGION_COUNT(smpt[i]) + 1;
}
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index 59dcedb08691..bd1866d714f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -2868,7 +2868,7 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt,
>> const u32 *ret = NULL;
>> u32 addr;
>> int err;
>> - u8 i;
>> + u8 i, ncmds, nmaps;
>> u8 addr_width, read_opcode, read_dummy;
>> u8 read_data_mask, data_byte, map_id;
>>
>> @@ -2877,6 +2877,7 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt,
>> read_opcode = nor->read_opcode;
>>
>> map_id = 0;
>> + ncmds = 0;
>> /* Determine if there are any optional Detection Command Descriptors */
>> for (i = 0; i < smpt_len; i += 2) {
>> if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)
>> @@ -2896,6 +2897,7 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt,
>> * Configuration that is currently in use.
>> */
>> map_id = map_id << 1 | !!(data_byte & read_data_mask);
>> + ncmds++;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2905,7 +2907,16 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt,
>> *
>> * Find the matching configuration map.
>> */
>> - while (i < smpt_len) {
>> + for (nmaps = 0; i < smpt_len; nmaps++) {
>> + /*
>> + * The map selector is limited to a maximum of 8 bits, allowing
>> + * for a maximum of 256 possible map configurations. The total
>> + * number of map configurations should be addressable by the
>> + * total number of bits described by the detection commands.
>> + */
>> + if (ncmds && nmaps >= (1 << (ncmds + 1)))
>> + break;
>> +
>
> Maybe I missed something but it sounds like this change is just
> optimizing the SPMT parsing a bit, and to be honest, I'm not sure this
> is really needed. Most of the time, smpt_len will be rather small, so
> trying to bail out earlier is not bringing much perf improvements.
It's rather a smtp validity check. I want to return an error if there are not
enough detection commands to identify the map id.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists