[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0781e8c-2448-eecf-2736-150fa5ea8d4f@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:43:00 +0530
From: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
evgreen@...omium.org, dianders@...gle.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
riteshh@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
sayalil@...eaurora.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add entries for
passing load values
On 10/12/2018 8:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:48:58PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote:
>> From: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator
>> is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for
>> the required load.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
>> index 502b3b8..cb22178 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
>> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ Required properties:
>> "xo" - TCXO clock (optional)
>> "cal" - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
>> "sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
>> +- qcom,<supply>-current-level-microamp - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON and
>> + BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in
>> + pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively.
>> + Units uA.
> Seems like something that should be common?
Hi Rob,
Can you please little elaborate your comment?
Do mean this should be common for all vendors, not specific to qcom-mmc?
Thanks,
Veera
Powered by blists - more mailing lists