| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3528fa4f-b6fc-3af2-65f7-56b5d41e0932@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:40:17 +0100
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com>,
Ken Goldman <kgold@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kenneth Goldman <kgoldman@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] tpm: dynamically allocate active_banks array
On 11/8/2018 2:50 PM, Nayna Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2018 03:11 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>> On 11/7/2018 7:14 AM, Nayna Jain wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/06/2018 08:31 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>>>> This patch removes the hard-coded limit of the active_banks array size.
>>>
>>>
>>> The hard-coded limit in static array active_banks[] represents the
>>> maximum possible banks.
>>> A TPM might have three banks, but only one bank may be active.
>>>
>>> To confirm my understanding, is the idea for this patch is to
>>> dynamically identify the number of possible banks or the number of
>>> active banks ?
>>
>> The idea is to dynamically identify the number of active banks.
>>
>> In the TPM Commands specification (section 30.2.1), I found:
>>
>> TPM_CAP_PCRS – Returns the current allocation of PCR in a
>> TPML_PCR_SELECTION.
>>
>> You mentioned:
>>
>> #TPM_RC_SIZE response code when count is greater
>> than the possible number of banks
>>
>> but TPML_PCR_SELECTION is provided by the TPM.
>
> Based on a discussion with Ken, the count in the TPML_PCR_SELECTION
> returns the number of possible algorithms supported. In the example
> below, two possible algorithms - SHA1 and SHA256 - are returned.
>
> # /usr/local/bin/tssgetcapability -cap 5
> 2 PCR selections
> hash TPM_ALG_SHA1
> TPMS_PCR_SELECTION length 3
> ff ff ff
> hash TPM_ALG_SHA256
> TPMS_PCR_SELECTION length 3
> 00 00 00
>
> The pcr_select fields - "ff ff ff" and "00 00 00" - are bit masks for
> the enabled PCRs. The SHA1 bank is enabled for all PCRs (0-23), while
> the SHA256 bank is not enabled.
>
> The current code works, but it unnecessarily extends some banks. Instead
> of basing the number of active banks on the number of algorithms
> returned, it should be based on the pcr_select field.
Thanks. I will add a bank if at least one bit is set in the pcr_select
mask.
Roberto
> - Mimi & Nayna
>
>
>>
>> Roberto
>>
>>
>>>> It stores in the tpm_chip structure the number of active PCR banks,
>>>> determined in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(), and replaces the static array
>>>> with a pointer to a dynamically allocated array.
>>>>
>>>> As a consequence of the introduction of nr_active_banks,
>>>> tpm_pcr_extend()
>>>> does not check anymore if the algorithm stored in tpm_chip is equal to
>>>> zero. The active_banks array always contains valid algorithms.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 1db15344f874 ("tpm: implement TPM 2.0 capability to get active
>>>> PCR banks")
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 1 +
>>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 3 ++-
>>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>>>> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>>>> index 46caadca916a..2a9e8b744436 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>>>> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void tpm_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>>>> kfree(chip->log.bios_event_log);
>>>> kfree(chip->work_space.context_buf);
>>>> kfree(chip->work_space.session_buf);
>>>> + kfree(chip->active_banks);
>>>> kfree(chip);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>>>> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>>>> index 1a803b0cf980..ba7ca6b3e664 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>>>> @@ -1039,8 +1039,7 @@ static int tpm1_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip
>>>> *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash,
>>>> int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8
>>>> *hash)
>>>> {
>>>> int rc;
>>>> - struct tpm2_digest digest_list[ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks)];
>>>> - u32 count = 0;
>>>> + struct tpm2_digest *digest_list;
>>>> int i;
>>>>
>>>> chip = tpm_find_get_ops(chip);
>>>> @@ -1048,16 +1047,22 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip,
>>>> int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash)
>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>
>>>> if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
>>>> - memset(digest_list, 0, sizeof(digest_list));
>>>> + digest_list = kmalloc_array(chip->nr_active_banks,
>>>> + sizeof(*digest_list), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!digest_list)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks) &&
>>>> - chip->active_banks[i] != TPM2_ALG_ERROR; i++) {
>>>> + memset(digest_list, 0,
>>>> + chip->nr_active_banks * sizeof(*digest_list));
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_active_banks; i++) {
>>>> digest_list[i].alg_id = chip->active_banks[i];
>>>> memcpy(digest_list[i].digest, hash, TPM_DIGEST_SIZE);
>>>> - count++;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - rc = tpm2_pcr_extend(chip, pcr_idx, count, digest_list);
>>>> + rc = tpm2_pcr_extend(chip, pcr_idx, chip->nr_active_banks,
>>>> + digest_list);
>>>> + kfree(digest_list);
>>>> tpm_put_ops(chip);
>>>> return rc;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
>>>> index f3501d05264f..98368c3a6ff7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
>>>> @@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ struct tpm_chip {
>>>> const struct attribute_group *groups[3];
>>>> unsigned int groups_cnt;
>>>>
>>>> - u16 active_banks[7];
>>>> + u32 nr_active_banks;
>>>> + u16 *active_banks;
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>>> acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle;
>>>> char ppi_version[TPM_PPI_VERSION_LEN + 1];
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>>>> index c31b490bd41d..533089cede07 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>>>> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ int tpm2_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int
>>>> pcr_idx, u32 count,
>>>> int i;
>>>> int j;
>>>>
>>>> - if (count > ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks))
>>>> + if (count > chip->nr_active_banks)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND);
>>>> @@ -859,7 +859,6 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct
>>>> tpm_chip *chip)
>>>> void *marker;
>>>> void *end;
>>>> void *pcr_select_offset;
>>>> - unsigned int count;
>>>> u32 sizeof_pcr_selection;
>>>> u32 rsp_len;
>>>> int rc;
>>>> @@ -878,11 +877,14 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct
>>>> tpm_chip *chip)
>>>> if (rc)
>>>> goto out;
>>>>
>>>> - count = be32_to_cpup(
>>>> + chip->nr_active_banks = be32_to_cpup(
>>>> (__be32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 5]);
>>>
>>>
>>> As per my understanding, the count in the TPML_PCR_SELECTION
>>> represent the number of possible banks and not the number of active
>>> banks.
>>> TCG Structures Spec for TPM 2.0 - Table 102 mentions this as
>>> explanation of #TPM_RC_SIZE.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> - Nayna
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - if (count > ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks)) {
>>>> - rc = -ENODEV;
>>>> + chip->active_banks = kmalloc_array(chip->nr_active_banks,
>>>> + sizeof(*chip->active_banks),
>>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!chip->active_banks) {
>>>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -891,7 +893,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct
>>>> tpm_chip *chip)
>>>> rsp_len = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf.data[2]);
>>>> end = &buf.data[rsp_len];
>>>>
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_active_banks; i++) {
>>>> pcr_select_offset = marker +
>>>> offsetof(struct tpm2_pcr_selection, size_of_select);
>>>> if (pcr_select_offset >= end) {
>>>> @@ -908,9 +910,6 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct
>>>> tpm_chip *chip)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> out:
>>>> - if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks))
>>>> - chip->active_banks[i] = TPM2_ALG_ERROR;
>>>> -
>>>> tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
>>>>
>>>> return rc;
>>>
>>
>
--
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI
Powered by blists - more mailing lists