[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+w1Qv6owkdWfjbXMFqOA8BURDN5gviw8vpgi3eon1dWmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:48:10 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
[...]
> Changes in v8:
> - Rebased onto 65102238 (4.20-rc1).
> - Added a note to the cover letter on why syscall wrappers/shims that untag
> user pointers won't work.
> - Added a note to the cover letter that this patchset has been merged into
> the Pixel 2 kernel tree.
> - Documentation fixes, in particular added a list of syscalls that don't
> support tagged user pointers.
Hi Catalin,
I've changed the documentation to be more specific, please take a look.
I haven't done anything about adding a way for the user to find out
that the kernel supports this ABI extension. I don't know what would
the the preferred way to do this, and we haven't received any comments
on that from anybody else. Probing "on some innocuous syscall
currently returning -EFAULT on tagged pointer arguments" works though,
as you mentioned.
As mentioned in the cover letter, this patchset has been merged into
the Pixel 2 kernel tree.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists