[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C718BB53-55C5-47E2-AB92-C4ACB79496F1@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:54:54 -0500
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/23] SUNRPC: simplify auth_unix.
> On Nov 7, 2018, at 8:41 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 07 2018, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil-
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 11:12 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 1/ discard 'struct unx_cred'. We don't need any data that
>>> is not already in 'struct rpc_cred'.
>>> 2/ Don't keep these creds in a hash table. When a credential
>>> is needed, simply allocate it. When not needed, discard it.
>>> This can easily be faster than performing a lookup on
>>> a shared hash table.
>
> Thanks for the review Chuck!
>
>>
>> What's the basis for this claim? A memory allocation disables and
>> enables IRQs. That definitely hits a resource that is globally
>> shared.
>
> My basis is not rock solid, but I was convinced :-)
>
> kmem_cache_alloc() does disable local irqs when slab.c is used.
> slub.c doesn't disable them in the fast path which I *think* should be
> reasonably common.
> slob always takes a spinlock as well as disabling interrupts.
>
> I think slob is only recommended for tiny machines, and slub is
> generally preferred, so I think that when performance matters, it will
> still be delivered.
>
> It isn't clear to me why you consider a local irq to be "globally
> shared" - assuming that is what you mean.
Globally-shared in this case can be construed somewhat narrowly.
If we assume slub, kmem_cache_alloc() touches resources that are
used by all tasks running on that CPU, at least in the slow path.
> Disabling local interrupts is not without cost, but I don't think the
> cost increases with the number of CPUs, while the cost of accessing
> shared memory (even without a spinlock) does.
Point taken, but having a single mempool for all RPC transports
and users is also going to be a shared resource that can
bottleneck.
I guess that's an argument in favor of building creds on demand
rather than keeping them in a hash table, isn't it. :-)
>> In addition, the comment near unx_marshal suggests we should
>> cache the marshaled on-the-wire version of the credential instead
>> of building it in the RPC Call buffer every time. That would
>> require keeping the creds around.
>
> That comment has been there since 2.1.32 and has not be acted on. There
> seems little reason to expect that to change. Caching doesn't seem to
> have been found to be necessary in practice.
>
>>
>> Have you measured a significant difference in throughput with
>> this patch? Have you considered improving the lookup speed of
>> the hash table by making the buckets into rb-trees, for example?
>
> No, I haven't measured.
> I might have briefly considered changing to an rb-tree, but as the
> current hashtable doesn't actually contain anything of value, I would
> have quickly discarded the idea.
>
> If I wanted to further improve performance, I would look at ways to
> bypass the "lookup_cred" step completely.
> unx_marshal only needs the generic "struct cred", so there should be no
> need to have a 'struct rpc_cred' at all.
>
> If this series is accepted, I'll (hopefully) look into seeing how
> practical that is.
>
> Thanks again,
> NeilBrown
>
>
>>
>>
>>> As the lookup can happen during write-out, use a mempool
>>> to ensure forward progress.
>>> This means that we cannot compare two credentials for
>>> equality by comparing the pointers, but we never do that anyway.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 1
>>> net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c | 101 +++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
>>> index 867ea9834bde..a07a7c59d3a4 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
>>> @@ -651,6 +651,7 @@ rpcauth_init_cred(struct rpc_cred *cred, const struct auth_cred *acred,
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cred->cr_lru);
>>> refcount_set(&cred->cr_count, 1);
>>> cred->cr_auth = auth;
>>> + cred->cr_flags = 0;
>>> cred->cr_ops = ops;
>>> cred->cr_expire = jiffies;
>>> cred->cr_cred = get_cred(acred->cred);
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c
>>> index bff113a411e0..387f6b3ffbea 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c
>>> @@ -11,16 +11,11 @@
>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/mempool.h>
>>> #include <linux/sunrpc/clnt.h>
>>> #include <linux/sunrpc/auth.h>
>>> #include <linux/user_namespace.h>
>>>
>>> -struct unx_cred {
>>> - struct rpc_cred uc_base;
>>> - kgid_t uc_gid;
>>> - kgid_t uc_gids[UNX_NGROUPS];
>>> -};
>>> -#define uc_uid uc_base.cr_uid
>>>
>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
>>> # define RPCDBG_FACILITY RPCDBG_AUTH
>>> @@ -28,6 +23,7 @@ struct unx_cred {
>>>
>>> static struct rpc_auth unix_auth;
>>> static const struct rpc_credops unix_credops;
>>> +static mempool_t *unix_pool;
>>>
>>> static struct rpc_auth *
>>> unx_create(const struct rpc_auth_create_args *args, struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
>>> @@ -42,15 +38,6 @@ static void
>>> unx_destroy(struct rpc_auth *auth)
>>> {
>>> dprintk("RPC: destroying UNIX authenticator %p\n", auth);
>>> - rpcauth_clear_credcache(auth->au_credcache);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static int
>>> -unx_hash_cred(struct auth_cred *acred, unsigned int hashbits)
>>> -{
>>> - return hash_64(from_kgid(&init_user_ns, acred->cred->fsgid) |
>>> - ((u64)from_kuid(&init_user_ns, acred->cred->fsuid) <<
>>> - (sizeof(gid_t) * 8)), hashbits);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -59,53 +46,24 @@ unx_hash_cred(struct auth_cred *acred, unsigned int hashbits)
>>> static struct rpc_cred *
>>> unx_lookup_cred(struct rpc_auth *auth, struct auth_cred *acred, int flags)
>>> {
>>> - return rpcauth_lookup_credcache(auth, acred, flags, GFP_NOFS);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static struct rpc_cred *
>>> -unx_create_cred(struct rpc_auth *auth, struct auth_cred *acred, int flags, gfp_t gfp)
>>> -{
>>> - struct unx_cred *cred;
>>> - unsigned int groups = 0;
>>> - unsigned int i;
>>> + struct rpc_cred *ret = mempool_alloc(unix_pool, GFP_NOFS);
>>>
>>> dprintk("RPC: allocating UNIX cred for uid %d gid %d\n",
>>> from_kuid(&init_user_ns, acred->cred->fsuid),
>>> from_kgid(&init_user_ns, acred->cred->fsgid));
>>>
>>> - if (!(cred = kmalloc(sizeof(*cred), gfp)))
>>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> -
>>> - rpcauth_init_cred(&cred->uc_base, acred, auth, &unix_credops);
>>> - cred->uc_base.cr_flags = 1UL << RPCAUTH_CRED_UPTODATE;
>>> -
>>> - if (acred->cred && acred->cred->group_info != NULL)
>>> - groups = acred->cred->group_info->ngroups;
>>> - if (groups > UNX_NGROUPS)
>>> - groups = UNX_NGROUPS;
>>> -
>>> - cred->uc_gid = acred->cred->fsgid;
>>> - for (i = 0; i < groups; i++)
>>> - cred->uc_gids[i] = acred->cred->group_info->gid[i];
>>> - if (i < UNX_NGROUPS)
>>> - cred->uc_gids[i] = INVALID_GID;
>>> -
>>> - return &cred->uc_base;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static void
>>> -unx_free_cred(struct unx_cred *unx_cred)
>>> -{
>>> - dprintk("RPC: unx_free_cred %p\n", unx_cred);
>>> - put_cred(unx_cred->uc_base.cr_cred);
>>> - kfree(unx_cred);
>>> + rpcauth_init_cred(ret, acred, auth, &unix_credops);
>>> + ret->cr_flags = 1UL << RPCAUTH_CRED_UPTODATE;
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void
>>> unx_free_cred_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
>>> {
>>> - struct unx_cred *unx_cred = container_of(head, struct unx_cred, uc_base.cr_rcu);
>>> - unx_free_cred(unx_cred);
>>> + struct rpc_cred *rpc_cred = container_of(head, struct rpc_cred, cr_rcu);
>>> + dprintk("RPC: unx_free_cred %p\n", rpc_cred);
>>> + put_cred(rpc_cred->cr_cred);
>>> + mempool_free(rpc_cred, unix_pool);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void
>>> @@ -115,30 +73,32 @@ unx_destroy_cred(struct rpc_cred *cred)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> - * Match credentials against current process creds.
>>> - * The root_override argument takes care of cases where the caller may
>>> - * request root creds (e.g. for NFS swapping).
>>> + * Match credentials against current the auth_cred.
>>> */
>>> static int
>>> -unx_match(struct auth_cred *acred, struct rpc_cred *rcred, int flags)
>>> +unx_match(struct auth_cred *acred, struct rpc_cred *cred, int flags)
>>> {
>>> - struct unx_cred *cred = container_of(rcred, struct unx_cred, uc_base);
>>> unsigned int groups = 0;
>>> unsigned int i;
>>>
>>> + if (cred->cr_cred == acred->cred)
>>> + return 1;
>>>
>>> - if (!uid_eq(cred->uc_uid, acred->cred->fsuid) || !gid_eq(cred->uc_gid, acred->cred->fsgid))
>>> + if (!uid_eq(cred->cr_cred->fsuid, acred->cred->fsuid) || !gid_eq(cred->cr_cred->fsgid, acred->cred->fsgid))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> if (acred->cred && acred->cred->group_info != NULL)
>>> groups = acred->cred->group_info->ngroups;
>>> if (groups > UNX_NGROUPS)
>>> groups = UNX_NGROUPS;
>>> + if (cred->cr_cred->group_info == NULL)
>>> + return groups == 0;
>>> + if (groups != cred->cr_cred->group_info->ngroups)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> for (i = 0; i < groups ; i++)
>>> - if (!gid_eq(cred->uc_gids[i], acred->cred->group_info->gid[i]))
>>> + if (!gid_eq(cred->cr_cred->group_info->gid[i], acred->cred->group_info->gid[i]))
>>> return 0;
>>> - if (groups < UNX_NGROUPS && gid_valid(cred->uc_gids[groups]))
>>> - return 0;
>>> return 1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -150,9 +110,10 @@ static __be32 *
>>> unx_marshal(struct rpc_task *task, __be32 *p)
>>> {
>>> struct rpc_clnt *clnt = task->tk_client;
>>> - struct unx_cred *cred = container_of(task->tk_rqstp->rq_cred, struct unx_cred, uc_base);
>>> + struct rpc_cred *cred = task->tk_rqstp->rq_cred;
>>> __be32 *base, *hold;
>>> int i;
>>> + struct group_info *gi = cred->cr_cred->group_info;
>>>
>>> *p++ = htonl(RPC_AUTH_UNIX);
>>> base = p++;
>>> @@ -163,11 +124,12 @@ unx_marshal(struct rpc_task *task, __be32 *p)
>>> */
>>> p = xdr_encode_array(p, clnt->cl_nodename, clnt->cl_nodelen);
>>>
>>> - *p++ = htonl((u32) from_kuid(&init_user_ns, cred->uc_uid));
>>> - *p++ = htonl((u32) from_kgid(&init_user_ns, cred->uc_gid));
>>> + *p++ = htonl((u32) from_kuid(&init_user_ns, cred->cr_cred->fsuid));
>>> + *p++ = htonl((u32) from_kgid(&init_user_ns, cred->cr_cred->fsgid));
>>> hold = p++;
>>> - for (i = 0; i < UNX_NGROUPS && gid_valid(cred->uc_gids[i]); i++)
>>> - *p++ = htonl((u32) from_kgid(&init_user_ns, cred->uc_gids[i]));
>>> + if (gi)
>>> + for (i = 0; i < UNX_NGROUPS && i < gi->ngroups; i++)
>>> + *p++ = htonl((u32) from_kgid(&init_user_ns, gi->gid[i]));
>>> *hold = htonl(p - hold - 1); /* gid array length */
>>> *base = htonl((p - base - 1) << 2); /* cred length */
>>>
>>> @@ -214,12 +176,13 @@ unx_validate(struct rpc_task *task, __be32 *p)
>>>
>>> int __init rpc_init_authunix(void)
>>> {
>>> - return rpcauth_init_credcache(&unix_auth);
>>> + unix_pool = mempool_create_kmalloc_pool(16, sizeof(struct rpc_cred));
>>> + return unix_pool ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>> void rpc_destroy_authunix(void)
>>> {
>>> - rpcauth_destroy_credcache(&unix_auth);
>>> + mempool_destroy(unix_pool);
>>> }
>>>
>>> const struct rpc_authops authunix_ops = {
>>> @@ -228,9 +191,7 @@ const struct rpc_authops authunix_ops = {
>>> .au_name = "UNIX",
>>> .create = unx_create,
>>> .destroy = unx_destroy,
>>> - .hash_cred = unx_hash_cred,
>>> .lookup_cred = unx_lookup_cred,
>>> - .crcreate = unx_create_cred,
>>> };
>>>
>>> static
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Chuck Lever
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists