[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181108160517.qnibb5yve7nlpzdq@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:05:17 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rcu: make RCU_BOOST default on RT
On 2018-11-01 16:25:18 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ config TINY_RCU
> >
> > config RCU_EXPERT
> > bool "Make expert-level adjustments to RCU configuration"
> > - default n
> > + default y if PREEMPT_RT_FULL
>
> Would it work to leave this as is, and ...
>
> > help
> > This option needs to be enabled if you wish to make
> > expert-level adjustments to RCU configuration. By default,
> > @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ config RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
> > config RCU_BOOST
> > bool "Enable RCU priority boosting"
> > depends on RT_MUTEXES && PREEMPT_RCU && RCU_EXPERT
>
> ... make the above line instead be:
>
> depends on (RT_MUTEXES && PREEMPT_RCU && RCU_EXPERT) || PREEMPT_RT_FULL
>
> Or am I missing something?
>
> I agree that the risk might currently seem small, but if Linus ever
> starts building PREEMPT_RT_FULL kernels, I really really do not want
> RCU_EXPERT to be set. ;-)
okay, this would work. Let me teak this in my current tree.
> Thanx, Paul
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists