lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 08:12:25 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     lcapitulino@...hat.com, julia@...com,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rcu: enable rcu_normal_after_boot by default for RT

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:52:26PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-11-01 16:02:35 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > The forcing of an expedited grace period is an expensive and very
> > > RT-application unfriendly operation, as it forcibly preempts all running
> > > tasks on CPUs which are preventing the gp from expiring.
> > > 
> > > By default, as a policy decision, disable the expediting of grace
> > > periods (after boot) on configurations which enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> > 
> > In case it matters:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Alternatively, any reason that I should not pull this into -rcu?

> because we don't have CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL yet.

Fair enough.  This particular case works without CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
defined, but up to you guys.

							Thanx, Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ