lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <597b9fba-5c3f-1718-072a-c984d5709e68@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:28:13 +0000
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, leo.yan@...aro.org,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] coresight: etm3x: Release CLAIM tag when operated
 from perf



On 07/11/2018 23:08, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This patch deals with the release of the CLAIM tag when the ETM is
> operated from perf.  Otherwise the tag is left asserted and subsequent
> requests to use the device fail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
> index 4f638d81a66a..d7f452e62193 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
> @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ static void etm_disable_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>   	 * power down the tracer.
>   	 */
>   	etm_set_pwrdwn(drvdata);
> +	coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked(drvdata->base);

Thanks for fixing this. IIUC, I think we have a problem in general with
mixing perf vs sysfs. Once a perf session uses the etm3x, we overwrite
the drvdata->config with the perf event specific controls and the sysfs
user may not be aware of that. We may have to do something similar we do
for ETR buf for sysfs/perf sessions. And then we may be able to merge
the enable/disable routines.

For this patch:

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ