[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154170172752.88331.2213352243956732809@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:28:47 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...ux.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] clk: imx: add SCCG PLL type
Quoting Abel Vesa (2018-11-08 04:29:39)
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:18:35PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Abel Vesa (2018-11-07 12:26:25)
> > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:01:02AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What's the plan to clean it up?
> > >
> > > So I'm doing this in our internal tree first to make sure I don't break the
> > > other (newer) socs.
> > >
> > > I already have a prototype in testing but it's a long way to upstream it.
> > >
> > > Basically, I'm replacing all of this with a single, more like a composite,
> > > more complex, clock type that does all the magic inside.
> > >
> > > One of the problems is the fact that the bypasses can have the same sources
> > > and in my case, I'm implementing that as a list of parents name, but the
> > > parent names list doesn't work with duplicates, so I have to find some other
> > > way to do it.
> > >
> > > Once I have something clean and tested enough I'll send it upstream.
> >
> > Ok. Thanks for the info.
> >
>
> Just to avoid any kind of confusion.
>
> The whole refactoring of the SCCG clock will be done in a separate (later) change
> and will not be part of this patchset.
>
> I already sent the 12th version of this current patch series and I would really
> like to get this in ASAP so that the booting up of imx8mq will not be delayed.
>
Ok. Well we're in rc1 right now, and so we're not merging new drivers
into mainline. I can merge the clk driver into clk-next, but you'll have
to wait for the stabilization period to end (approximately 6 or 7 weeks)
before this can get into the next kernel version. It will be in
linux-next much sooner of course.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists