[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181108122435.65eceefe@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:24:35 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
aaron.lu@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, bsd@...hat.com,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
jgg@...lanox.com, jwadams@...gle.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
mhocko@...nel.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com, prasad.singamsetty@...cle.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, steven.sistare@...cle.com,
tim.c.chen@...el.com, tj@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
peterz@...radead.org, dhaval.giani@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 01/13] ktask: add documentation
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:15:53 -0800
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> wrote:
> > - You have kerneldoc comments for the API functions, but you don't pull
> > those into the documentation itself. Adding some kernel-doc directives
> > could help to fill things out nicely with little effort.
>
> I thought this part of ktask.rst handled that, or am I not doing it right?
>
> Interface
> =========
>
> .. kernel-doc:: include/linux/ktask.h
Sigh, no, you're doing it just fine, and I clearly wasn't sufficiently
caffeinated. Apologies for the noise.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists