lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1541709268-3766-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu,  8 Nov 2018 15:34:17 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/12] locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_set_novalidate_class()

The current lockdep_set_novalidate_class() implementation is like
a hack. It assigns a special class key for that lock and calls
lockdep_init_map() twice.

This patch changes the implementation to make it more general so that
it can be used by other special lock class types. A new "type" field
is added to both the lockdep_map and lock_class structures.

The new field can now be used to designate a lock and a class object
as novalidate. The lockdep_set_novalidate_class() call, however, should
be called before lock initialization which calls lockdep_init_map().

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  | 14 +++++++++++---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 1fd82ff..18f9607 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ struct lock_class_key {
 	struct lockdep_subclass_key	subkeys[MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES];
 };
 
-extern struct lock_class_key __lockdep_no_validate__;
-
 #define LOCKSTAT_POINTS		4
 
 /*
@@ -102,6 +100,8 @@ struct lock_class {
 	int				name_version;
 	const char			*name;
 
+	unsigned int			flags;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
 	unsigned long			contention_point[LOCKSTAT_POINTS];
 	unsigned long			contending_point[LOCKSTAT_POINTS];
@@ -142,6 +142,12 @@ struct lock_class_stats {
 #endif
 
 /*
+ * Lockdep class flags
+ * 1) LOCKDEP_FLAG_NOVALIDATE: No full validation, just simple checks.
+ */
+#define LOCKDEP_FLAG_NOVALIDATE 	(1 << 0)
+
+/*
  * Map the lock object (the lock instance) to the lock-class object.
  * This is embedded into specific lock instances:
  */
@@ -149,6 +155,7 @@ struct lockdep_map {
 	struct lock_class_key		*key;
 	struct lock_class		*class_cache[NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES];
 	const char			*name;
+	unsigned int			flags;
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
 	int				cpu;
 	unsigned long			ip;
@@ -296,7 +303,8 @@ extern void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 				 (lock)->dep_map.key, sub)
 
 #define lockdep_set_novalidate_class(lock) \
-	lockdep_set_class_and_name(lock, &__lockdep_no_validate__, #lock)
+	do { (lock)->dep_map.flags |= LOCKDEP_FLAG_NOVALIDATE; } while (0)
+
 /*
  * Compare locking classes
  */
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 1efada2..493b567 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -692,10 +692,11 @@ static int count_matching_names(struct lock_class *new_class)
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(class, hash_head, hash_entry) {
 		if (class->key == key) {
 			/*
-			 * Huh! same key, different name? Did someone trample
-			 * on some memory? We're most confused.
+			 * Huh! same key, different name or flags? Did someone
+			 * trample on some memory? We're most confused.
 			 */
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name != lock->name);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE((class->name  != lock->name) ||
+				     (class->flags != lock->flags));
 			return class;
 		}
 	}
@@ -788,6 +789,7 @@ static bool assign_lock_key(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 	debug_atomic_inc(nr_unused_locks);
 	class->key = key;
 	class->name = lock->name;
+	class->flags = lock->flags;
 	class->subclass = subclass;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before);
@@ -3108,6 +3110,7 @@ static void __lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 		return;
 	}
 
+	lock->flags = 0;
 	lock->name = name;
 
 	/*
@@ -3152,9 +3155,6 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_init_map);
 
-struct lock_class_key __lockdep_no_validate__;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__lockdep_no_validate__);
-
 static int
 print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(struct task_struct *curr,
 				struct held_lock *hlock,
@@ -3215,7 +3215,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!prove_locking || lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__)
+	if (!prove_locking || (lock->flags & LOCKDEP_FLAG_NOVALIDATE))
 		check = 0;
 
 	if (subclass < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES)
-- 
1.8.3.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ