[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHd-oW4wo7fShsNMf7a1udnCepUL+ok+Gk7jzVoEUEUjaPCXpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:19:52 -0200
From: Matheus Tavares Bernardino <matheus.bernardino@....br>
To: festevam@...il.com
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-usp@...glegroups.com,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
Victor Colombo <victorcolombo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] staging:iio:ad2s90: Add SPDX license identifier
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:13 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Matheus,
>
Hi, Fabio
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:01 PM Matheus Tavares
> <matheus.bernardino@....br> wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds the SPDX GPL-2.0-only license identifier to ad2s90.c,
> > which solves the checkpatch.pl warning:
> > "WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@....br>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c
> > index 949ff55ac6b0..f439da721df8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>
> This should be:
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Hm, but it seems that the identifier "GPL-2.0" is deprecated, look:
https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html. It has been updated to
"GPL-2.0-only" in license list v3
(https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html). Is there some other
reason to use the deprecated "GPL-2.0" that I'm not aware of?
Thanks,
Matheus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists