linux-kernel - Re: [mm PATCH v5 3/7] mm: Implement new zone specific memblock iterator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181109232654.bi37bdkrqbogbdcx@xakep.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 9 Nov 2018 18:26:54 -0500
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com, mhocko@...e.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        dave.jiang@...el.com, rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, willy@...radead.org,
        vbabka@...e.cz, khalid.aziz@...cle.com, ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, yi.z.zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [mm PATCH v5 3/7] mm: Implement new zone specific memblock
 iterator

> +/**
> + * for_each_free_mem_range_in_zone - iterate through zone specific free
> + * memblock areas
> + * @i: u64 used as loop variable
> + * @zone: zone in which all of the memory blocks reside
> + * @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
> + * @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
> + *
> + * Walks over free (memory && !reserved) areas of memblock in a specific
> + * zone. Available as soon as memblock is initialized.
> + */
> +#define for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(i, zone, p_start, p_end)	\
> +	for (i = 0,							\
> +	     __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, p_start, p_end);	\
> +	     i != (u64)ULLONG_MAX;					\
> +	     __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, p_start, p_end))
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT */

Use U64_MAX instead of ULLONG_MAX, and avoid u64 cast. I know other
places in this file use UULONG_MAX with cast, but I think U64_MAX is
better.

> +
>  /**
>   * for_each_free_mem_range - iterate through free memblock areas
>   * @i: u64 used as loop variable
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 7df468c8ebc8..f1d1fbfd1ae7 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1239,6 +1239,69 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
> +/**
> + * __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone - iterator for for_each_*_range_in_zone()
> + *
> + * @idx: pointer to u64 loop variable
> + * @zone: zone in which all of the memory blocks reside
> + * @out_start: ptr to ulong for start pfn of the range, can be %NULL
> + * @out_end: ptr to ulong for end pfn of the range, can be %NULL
> + *
> + * This function is meant to be a zone/pfn specific wrapper for the
> + * for_each_mem_range type iterators. Specifically they are used in the
> + * deferred memory init routines and as such we were duplicating much of
> + * this logic throughout the code. So instead of having it in multiple
> + * locations it seemed like it would make more sense to centralize this to
> + * one new iterator that does everything they need.
> + */
> +void __init_memblock
> +__next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *idx, struct zone *zone,
> +			     unsigned long *out_spfn, unsigned long *out_epfn)
> +{
> +	int zone_nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> +	phys_addr_t spa, epa;
> +	int nid;
> +
> +	__next_mem_range(idx, zone_nid, MEMBLOCK_NONE,
> +			 &memblock.memory, &memblock.reserved,
> +			 &spa, &epa, &nid);
> +
> +	while (*idx != ULLONG_MAX) {

Ditto, use U64_MAX

> +		unsigned long epfn = PFN_DOWN(epa);
> +		unsigned long spfn = PFN_UP(spa);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Verify the end is at least past the start of the zone and
> +		 * that we have at least one PFN to initialize.
> +		 */
> +		if (zone->zone_start_pfn < epfn && spfn < epfn) {
> +			/* if we went too far just stop searching */
> +			if (zone_end_pfn(zone) <= spfn)
> +				break;

Set *idx = U64_MAX here, then break. This way after we are outside this
while loop idx is always equals to U64_MAX.

> +
> +			if (out_spfn)
> +				*out_spfn = max(zone->zone_start_pfn, spfn);
> +			if (out_epfn)
> +				*out_epfn = min(zone_end_pfn(zone), epfn);

Don't we need to verify after adjustment that out_spfn != out_epfn, so
there is at least one PFN to initialize?

The rest looks good. Once the above is fixed:

Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>

Thank you,
Pasha