[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1541743565-23163-8-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 22:05:55 -0800
From: frowand.list@...il.com
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 07/17] of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Order the fields of struct fragment in the same order as
struct of_overlay_notify_data. The order in struct fragment is
not significant. If both structs are ordered the same then when
examining the data in a debugger or dump the human involved does
not have to remember which context they are examining.
Tested-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
---
drivers/of/overlay.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
index 9808aae4621a..15be3da34fef 100644
--- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ struct target {
* @overlay: pointer to the __overlay__ node
*/
struct fragment {
- struct device_node *target;
struct device_node *overlay;
+ struct device_node *target;
};
/**
--
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists