lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181109082448.150302-2-drinkcat@chromium.org>
Date:   Fri,  9 Nov 2018 16:24:46 +0800
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Levin Alexander <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>, yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm: When CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is set, use DMA32 for SLAB_CACHE_DMA

Some callers, namely iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s, expect the physical
address returned by kmem_cache_alloc with GFP_DMA parameter to be
a 32-bit address.

Instead of adding a separate SLAB_CACHE_DMA32 (and then audit
all the calls to check if they require memory from DMA or DMA32
zone), we simply allocate SLAB_CACHE_DMA cache in DMA32 region,
if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is set.

Fixes: ad67f5a6545f ("arm64: replace ZONE_DMA with ZONE_DMA32")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
---
 include/linux/slab.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
 mm/slab.c            |  2 +-
 mm/slub.c            |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index 918f374e7156f4..390afe90c5dec0 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 #define SLAB_POISON		((slab_flags_t __force)0x00000800U)
 /* Align objs on cache lines */
 #define SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN	((slab_flags_t __force)0x00002000U)
-/* Use GFP_DMA memory */
+/* Use GFP_DMA or GFP_DMA32 memory */
 #define SLAB_CACHE_DMA		((slab_flags_t __force)0x00004000U)
 /* DEBUG: Store the last owner for bug hunting */
 #define SLAB_STORE_USER		((slab_flags_t __force)0x00010000U)
@@ -126,6 +126,17 @@
 #define ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) <= \
 				(unsigned long)ZERO_SIZE_PTR)
 
+/*
+ * When ZONE_DMA32 is defined, have SLAB_CACHE_DMA allocate memory with
+ * GFP_DMA32 instead of GFP_DMA, as this is what some of the callers
+ * require (instead of duplicating cache for DMA and DMA32 zones).
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
+#define SLAB_CACHE_DMA_GFP GFP_DMA32
+#else
+#define SLAB_CACHE_DMA_GFP GFP_DMA
+#endif
+
 #include <linux/kasan.h>
 
 struct mem_cgroup;
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 2a5654bb3b3ff3..8810daa052dcdc 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -2121,7 +2121,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *cachep, slab_flags_t flags)
 	cachep->flags = flags;
 	cachep->allocflags = __GFP_COMP;
 	if (flags & SLAB_CACHE_DMA)
-		cachep->allocflags |= GFP_DMA;
+		cachep->allocflags |= SLAB_CACHE_DMA_GFP;
 	if (flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
 		cachep->allocflags |= __GFP_RECLAIMABLE;
 	cachep->size = size;
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index e3629cd7aff164..fdd05323e54cbd 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3575,7 +3575,7 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
 		s->allocflags |= __GFP_COMP;
 
 	if (s->flags & SLAB_CACHE_DMA)
-		s->allocflags |= GFP_DMA;
+		s->allocflags |= SLAB_CACHE_DMA_GFP;
 
 	if (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
 		s->allocflags |= __GFP_RECLAIMABLE;
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ