| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1541758065-10952-17-git-send-email-henrik@austad.us>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:07:44 +0100
From: Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Henrik Austad <haustad@...co.com>,
Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, juri.lelli@....com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jdesfossez@...icios.com, bristot@...hat.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter
From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
commit 2a1c6029940675abb2217b590512dbf691867ec4 upstream.
We should deboost before waking the high-priority task, such that we
don't run two tasks with the same "state" (priority, deadline,
sched_class, etc).
In order to make sure the boosting task doesn't start running between
unlock and deboost (due to 'spurious' wakeup), we move the deboost
under the wait_lock, that way its serialized against the wait loop in
__rt_mutex_slowlock().
Doing the deboost early can however lead to priority-inversion if
current would get preempted after the deboost but before waking our
high-prio task, hence we disable preemption before doing deboost, and
enabling it after the wake up is over.
This gets us the right semantic order, but most importantly however;
this change ensures pointer stability for the next patch, where we
have rt_mutex_setprio() cache a pointer to the top-most waiter task.
If we, as before this change, do the wakeup first and then deboost,
this pointer might point into thin air.
[peterz: Changelog + patch munging]
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: juri.lelli@....com
Cc: bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Cc: jdesfossez@...icios.com
Cc: bristot@...hat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170323150216.110065320@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Henrik Austad <haustad@...co.com>
---
kernel/futex.c | 5 +---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index afb02a7..63fa840 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1457,10 +1457,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_
out_unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
- if (deboost) {
- wake_up_q(&wake_q);
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
- }
+ rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index b061a79..c01d7f4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -371,24 +371,6 @@ static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
}
/*
- * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of
- * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock().
- *
- * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to
- * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority
- * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are
- * outside of the debug path.)
- */
-void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
- __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-}
-
-/*
* Deadlock detection is conditional:
*
* If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
@@ -1049,6 +1031,7 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,
* lock->wait_lock.
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
+ __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
/*
* As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays
@@ -1391,6 +1374,16 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
*/
mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
+ /*
+ * We should deboost before waking the top waiter task such that
+ * we don't run two tasks with the 'same' priority. This however
+ * can lead to prio-inversion if we would get preempted after
+ * the deboost but before waking our high-prio task, hence the
+ * preempt_disable before unlock. Pairs with preempt_enable() in
+ * rt_mutex_postunlock();
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
+
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
/* check PI boosting */
@@ -1440,6 +1433,18 @@ rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
return slowfn(lock);
}
+/*
+ * Undo pi boosting (if necessary) and wake top waiter.
+ */
+void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost)
+{
+ wake_up_q(wake_q);
+
+ /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in rt_mutex_slowunlock() */
+ if (deboost)
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
static inline void
rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
bool (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock,
@@ -1453,11 +1458,7 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
deboost = slowfn(lock, &wake_q);
- wake_up_q(&wake_q);
-
- /* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */
- if (deboost)
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
+ rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
}
/**
@@ -1570,6 +1571,13 @@ bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
}
mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
+ /*
+ * We've already deboosted, retain preempt_disabled when dropping
+ * the wait_lock to avoid inversion until the wakeup. Matched
+ * by rt_mutex_postunlock();
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
+
return true; /* deboost and wakeups */
}
@@ -1582,10 +1590,7 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
deboost = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wake_q);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
- if (deboost) {
- wake_up_q(&wake_q);
- rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
- }
+ rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
}
/**
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
index 25ccf71..6f07357 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ extern void rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern bool __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct wake_q_head *wqh);
-extern void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task);
+extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
# include "rtmutex-debug.h"
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists