[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1541758065-10952-3-git-send-email-henrik@austad.us>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:07:30 +0100
From: Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Henrik Austad <haustad@...co.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, juri.lelli@....com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, xlpang@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jdesfossez@...icios.com,
dvhart@...radead.org, bristot@...hat.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 02/17] futex: Use smp_store_release() in mark_wake_futex()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit 1b367ece0d7e696cab1c8501bab282cc6a538b3f upstream.
Since the futex_q can dissapear the instruction after assigning NULL,
this really should be a RELEASE barrier. That stops loads from hitting
dead memory too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: juri.lelli@....com
Cc: bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc: xlpang@...hat.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Cc: jdesfossez@...icios.com
Cc: dvhart@...radead.org
Cc: bristot@...hat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104151.604296452@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Henrik Austad <haustad@...co.com>
---
kernel/futex.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index bb87324..9e92f12 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1284,8 +1284,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
* memory barrier is required here to prevent the following
* store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the plist_del.
*/
- smp_wmb();
- q->lock_ptr = NULL;
+ smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
}
static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *top_waiter,
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists