[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ea93154-4843-231d-d72b-bf12c8807c24@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:50:41 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
xishi.qiuxishi@...baba-inc.com,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 02/11] mm: soft-offline: add missing error check
of set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page()
On 11/09/2018 12:17 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() could fail, then the target page is
> finally not isolated, so it's better to report -EBUSY for userspace
> to know the failure and chance of retry.
>
IIUC set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() could only fail if the page is not
free in the buddy. At least for soft_offline_huge_page() that wont be
the case otherwise dissolve_free_huge_page() would have returned non
zero -EBUSY. Is there any other reason set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page()
would not succeed ?
> And for consistency, this patch moves set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page()
> in unmap_and_move() to __soft_offline_page().
Yeah this check should be handled in soft offline functions not inside
migrations they trigger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists