[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d37c1be2-2069-a147-9ba8-4749cd386d0b@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:03:06 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
xishi.qiuxishi@...baba-inc.com,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 11/11] mm: hwpoison: introduce
clear_hwpoison_free_buddy_page()
On 11/09/2018 12:17 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> The new function is a reverse operation of set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page()
> to adjust unpoison_memory() to the new semantics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
snip
> +
> +/*
> + * Reverse operation of set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page(), which is expected
> + * to work only on error pages isolated from buddy allocator.
> + */
> +bool clear_hwpoison_free_buddy_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> + bool unpoisoned = false;
> +
> + spin_lock(&zone->lock);
> + if (TestClearPageHWPoison(page)) {
> + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + int migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> +
> + __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, 0, migratetype);
> + unpoisoned = true;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
> + return unpoisoned;
> +}
> #endif
>
Though there are multiple page state checks in unpoison_memory() leading
upto clearing HWPoison flag, the page must not be in buddy already if
__free_one_page() would be called on it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists