linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181109152139.zig45f6gp24btfbc@treble>
Date:   Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:21:39 -0600
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:16:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:28 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > All other usecases are bonus, but it would certainly be interesting to
> > investigate the impact of using these APIs for tracing: that too is a
> > feature enabled everywhere but utilized only by a small fraction of Linux
> > users - so literally every single cycle or instruction saved or hot-path
> > shortened is a major win.
> 
> For tracing, we'd want static_call_set_to_nop() or something like that, right?

Are we talking about tracepoints?  Or ftrace?

-- 
Josh