[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181109180407.GO13195@uranus.lan>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:04:07 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix and merge proc-self-map-file tests
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:01:13AM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
>
> Alright, I'm fixing membarrier_test before, so.. I guess we have a competition.. =o)
Rafael, Alexey, what about simply wrap the test code with x86 and extend later
with all archs which support zero address mapping?
---
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
Index: linux-ml.git/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
===================================================================
--- linux-ml.git.orig/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
+++ linux-ml.git/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+/*
+ * Should run on archs which support zero address mapping.
+ */
+#if defined(__i386) || defined(__x86_64)
+
static void pass(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
char name[64];
@@ -83,3 +88,12 @@ int main(void)
return 0;
}
+
+#else
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists