[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181109105314.c6a6acfa9badba6733c3f72e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:53:14 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] slab: use logical instead of bitwise operation
in kmalloc_type()
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:35:34 +0100 Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> The operation here really is more logical than bitwise, even if
> due to the setup the bitwise operation works fine. However, this
> causes a complaint from sparse that the operation doesn't really
> make sense due to the not.
>
> Use a logical and instead of bitwise.
>
> In my (somewhat unscientific) test this caused no differences in
> the generated code.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static __always_inline enum kmalloc_cache_type kmalloc_type(gfp_t flags)
> * If an allocation is both __GFP_DMA and __GFP_RECLAIMABLE, return
> * KMALLOC_DMA and effectively ignore __GFP_RECLAIMABLE
> */
> - return type_dma + (is_reclaimable & !is_dma) * KMALLOC_RECLAIM;
> + return type_dma + (is_reclaimable && !is_dma) * KMALLOC_RECLAIM;
> }
>
> /*
Thanks. There's presently a bit of head-scratching going on over this.
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105204000.129023-1-bvanassche@acm.org -
please feel free to weigh in ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists