linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] binder: ipc namespace support for android binder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHRSSEzc96qbDOQt8L+J4JMAazYv-d2xdyLT2nyPe7_t+8_5=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:03:45 -0800
From:   Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
To:     dave@...olabs.net
Cc:     chouryzhou@...cent.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] binder: ipc namespace support for android binder

On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:27 AM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2018, chouryzhou(??????) wrote:
>
> >+#ifdef CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_IPC
> >+       /* next fields are for binder */
> >+       struct mutex      binder_procs_lock;
> >+       struct hlist_head binder_procs;
> >+       struct hlist_head binder_contexts;
> >+#endif
>
> Now, I took a look at how the binder_procs list is used; and no, what
> follows isn't really related to this patch, but a general observation.
>
> I think that a mutex is also an overkill and you might wanna replace it
> with a spinlock/rwlock. Can anything block while holding the binder_procs_lock?
> I don't see anything... you mainly need it for consulting the hlist calling
> print_binder_proc[_stat]() - which will take the proc->inner_lock anyway, so
> no blocking there.

print_binder_proc() drops proc->inner_lock and calls
binder_alloc_print_allocated() which acquires proc->alloc->mutex.
Likewise, print_binder_stats() calls print_binder_proc_stats() which
drops its locks to call binder_alloc_print_pages() which also acquires
proc->alloc->mutex. So binder_procs_lock needs to be a mutex since it
can block on proc->alloc->mutex.

> Also, if this is perhaps because of long hold times, dunno,
> the rb_first_cached primitive might reduce some of it, although I don't know
> how big the rbtrees in binder can get and if it matters at all.
>
> Anyway, that said and along with addressing Todd's comments, the ipc/ bits look
> good. Feel free to add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr