linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] SG_IO command filtering via sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181110190521.GA2627@thunk.org>
Date:   Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:05:21 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] SG_IO command filtering via sysfs

I wonder if a better way of adding SG_IO command filtering is via
eBPF?  We are currently carrying a inside Google a patch which allows
a specific of SCSI commands to non-root processes --- if the process
belonged to a particular Unix group id.

It's pretty specific to our use case, in terms of the specific SCSI
commands we want to allow through.  I can imagine people wanting
different filters based on the type of the SCSI device, or a HDD's
WWID, not just a group id.  For example, this might be useful for
people wanting to do crazy things with containers --- maybe you'd
want to allow container root to send a SANITIZE ERASE command to one
of its exclusively assigned disks, but not to other HDD's.

So having something that's more general than a flat file in sysfs
might be preferable to resurrecting an interface which we would then
after to support forever, even if we come up with a more general
interface.

					- Ted