[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <001001d4793f$020a7f90$061f7eb0$@net>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 13:47:33 -0800
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: "'Srinivas Pandruvada'" <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Frederic Weisbecker'" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"'Mel Gorman'" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"'Daniel Lezcano'" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"'Linux PM'" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Doug Smythies'" <dsmythies@...us.net>,
"'Giovanni Gherdovich'" <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Subject: RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v3] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems
On 2018.11.07 09:04 Doug Smythies wrote:
> The Phoronix dbench test was run under the option to run all
> the tests, instead of just one number of clients. This was done
> with a reference/baseline kernel of 4.20-rc1, and also with this
> TEO version 3 patch. The tests were also repeated with trace
> enabled for 5000 seconds. Idle information and processor
> package power were sampled once per minute in all test runs.
>
> The results are:
> http://fast.smythies.com/linux-pm/k420/k420-dbench-teo3.htm
> http://fast.smythies.com/linux-pm/k420/histo_compare.htm
Another observation from the data, and for the reference/
baseline 4.20-rc1 kernel, idle state 0 histogram plots
is that there are several (280) long idle durations.
For unknown reasons, these are consistently dominated by
CPU 5 on my system (264 of the 280, in this case).
No other test that I have tried shows this issue,
But other tests also tend to set the need_resched
flag whereas the dbench test doesn't.
Older kernels also have the issue. I tried: 4.19, 4.18
4.17, 4.16+"V9" idle re-work patch set of the time.
There is no use going back further, because "V9" was
to address excessively long durations in shallow idle states.
I have not made progress towards determining the root issue.
... Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists