linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_set_novalidate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181110141458.GE3339@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Sat, 10 Nov 2018 15:14:58 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] locking/lockdep: Rework
 lockdep_set_novalidate_class()

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:34:17PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> The current lockdep_set_novalidate_class() implementation is like
> a hack. It assigns a special class key for that lock and calls
> lockdep_init_map() twice.

Ideally it would go away.. it is not thing that should be used.

> This patch changes the implementation to make it more general so that
> it can be used by other special lock class types. A new "type" field
> is added to both the lockdep_map and lock_class structures.
> 
> The new field can now be used to designate a lock and a class object
> as novalidate. The lockdep_set_novalidate_class() call, however, should
> be called before lock initialization which calls lockdep_init_map().

I don't really feel like this is something that should be made easier or
better.

> @@ -102,6 +100,8 @@ struct lock_class {
>  	int				name_version;
>  	const char			*name;
>  
> +	unsigned int			flags;
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
>  	unsigned long			contention_point[LOCKSTAT_POINTS];
>  	unsigned long			contending_point[LOCKSTAT_POINTS];

Esp. not at the cost of growing the data structures.