[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181110010708.d3nayrzuy5d3lrkd@mail.google.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:41:12 +0800
From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/mm: declare check_la57_support() as inline
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 01:27:29AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:28 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:09 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 13:09:42 +0000
> > > > Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The level4_kernel_pgt is only defined when X86_5LEVEL is enabled.
> > > > > So declare check_la57_support() as inline to make sure the code
> > > > > referring to level4_kernel_pgt is optimized out. This is a preparation
> > > > > for CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > >
> > > > -- Steve
> > > >
> > >
> > > Applied to linux-kbuild.
> >
> > Next time, before you route a patch through your tree, please get an x86
> > maintainer's ACK first.
>
>
> I changed my mind, and did not include this in my previous pull request
> because this series is causing many warnings.
>
Most of the new warnings are false warnings. Since this series didn't change any
code where the warnings happen. I'll make patches to make gcc happy.
> Now, it is aiming for v5.0-rc1
>
> So, it is not too late.
>
> If x86 maintainers issue Acked-by,
> I am happy to add it.
>
>
>
>
> > Thx.
> >
> > --
> > Regards/Gruss,
> > Boris.
> >
> > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
--
Thanks,
Changbin Du
Powered by blists - more mailing lists