[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:28:57 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/14] rcu: Adjust the comment of function rcu_is_watching
From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Because RCU avoids interrupting idle CPUs, rcu_is_watching() is used to
test whether or not it is currently legal to run RCU read-side critical
sections on this CPU. However, the first sentence and last sentences
of current comment for rcu_is_watching have opposite meaning of what
is expected. This commit therefore fixes this header comment.
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index e7c9848d1e1b..429a46fb087a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -904,12 +904,12 @@ void rcu_irq_enter_irqson(void)
}
/**
- * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is idle
+ * rcu_is_watching - see if RCU thinks that the current CPU is not idle
*
* Return true if RCU is watching the running CPU, which means that this
* CPU can safely enter RCU read-side critical sections. In other words,
- * if the current CPU is in its idle loop and is neither in an interrupt
- * or NMI handler, return true.
+ * if the current CPU is not in its idle loop or is in an interrupt or
+ * NMI handler, return true.
*/
bool notrace rcu_is_watching(void)
{
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists