| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:19:14 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 090/350] nvmet-rdma: use a private workqueue for delete
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
[ Upstream commit 2acf70ade79d26b97611a8df52eb22aa33814cd4 ]
Queue deletion is done asynchronous when the last reference on the queue
is dropped. Thus, in order to make sure we don't over allocate under a
connect/disconnect storm, we let queue deletion complete before making
forward progress.
However, given that we flush the system_wq from rdma_cm context which
runs from a workqueue context, we can have a circular locking complaint
[1]. Fix that by using a private workqueue for queue deletion.
[1]:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.19.0-rc4-dbg+ #3 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/5:0/39 is trying to acquire lock:
00000000a10b6db9 (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: rdma_destroy_id+0x6f/0x440 [rdma_cm]
but task is already holding lock:
00000000331b4e2c ((work_completion)(&queue->release_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x3ed/0xa20
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 ((work_completion)(&queue->release_work)){+.+.}:
process_one_work+0x474/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
-> #2 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}:
flush_workqueue+0xf3/0x970
nvmet_rdma_cm_handler+0x133d/0x1734 [nvmet_rdma]
cma_ib_req_handler+0x72f/0xf90 [rdma_cm]
cm_process_work+0x2e/0x110 [ib_cm]
cm_req_handler+0x135b/0x1c30 [ib_cm]
cm_work_handler+0x2b7/0x38cd [ib_cm]
process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa20
nvmet_rdma:nvmet_rdma_cm_handler: nvmet_rdma: disconnected (10): status 0 id 0000000040357082
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
nvme nvme0: Reconnecting in 10 seconds...
-> #1 (&id_priv->handler_mutex/1){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock+0xfe/0xbe0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
cma_ib_req_handler+0x6aa/0xf90 [rdma_cm]
cm_process_work+0x2e/0x110 [ib_cm]
cm_req_handler+0x135b/0x1c30 [ib_cm]
cm_work_handler+0x2b7/0x38cd [ib_cm]
process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
-> #0 (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0xc5/0x200
__mutex_lock+0xfe/0xbe0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
rdma_destroy_id+0x6f/0x440 [rdma_cm]
nvmet_rdma_release_queue_work+0x8e/0x1b0 [nvmet_rdma]
process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
Fixes: 777dc82395de ("nvmet-rdma: occasionally flush ongoing controller teardown")
Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct nvmet_rdma_device {
struct list_head entry;
};
+struct workqueue_struct *nvmet_rdma_delete_wq;
static bool nvmet_rdma_use_srq;
module_param_named(use_srq, nvmet_rdma_use_srq, bool, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_srq, "Use shared receive queue.");
@@ -1169,12 +1170,12 @@ static int nvmet_rdma_queue_connect(stru
if (queue->host_qid == 0) {
/* Let inflight controller teardown complete */
- flush_scheduled_work();
+ flush_workqueue(nvmet_rdma_delete_wq);
}
ret = nvmet_rdma_cm_accept(cm_id, queue, &event->param.conn);
if (ret) {
- schedule_work(&queue->release_work);
+ queue_work(nvmet_rdma_delete_wq, &queue->release_work);
/* Destroying rdma_cm id is not needed here */
return 0;
}
@@ -1239,7 +1240,7 @@ static void __nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnec
if (disconnect) {
rdma_disconnect(queue->cm_id);
- schedule_work(&queue->release_work);
+ queue_work(nvmet_rdma_delete_wq, &queue->release_work);
}
}
@@ -1269,7 +1270,7 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_queue_connect_fai
mutex_unlock(&nvmet_rdma_queue_mutex);
pr_err("failed to connect queue %d\n", queue->idx);
- schedule_work(&queue->release_work);
+ queue_work(nvmet_rdma_delete_wq, &queue->release_work);
}
/**
@@ -1543,8 +1544,17 @@ static int __init nvmet_rdma_init(void)
if (ret)
goto err_ib_client;
+ nvmet_rdma_delete_wq = alloc_workqueue("nvmet-rdma-delete-wq",
+ WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_SYSFS, 0);
+ if (!nvmet_rdma_delete_wq) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_unreg_transport;
+ }
+
return 0;
+err_unreg_transport:
+ nvmet_unregister_transport(&nvmet_rdma_ops);
err_ib_client:
ib_unregister_client(&nvmet_rdma_ib_client);
return ret;
@@ -1552,6 +1562,7 @@ err_ib_client:
static void __exit nvmet_rdma_exit(void)
{
+ destroy_workqueue(nvmet_rdma_delete_wq);
nvmet_unregister_transport(&nvmet_rdma_ops);
ib_unregister_client(&nvmet_rdma_ib_client);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&nvmet_rdma_queue_list));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists