[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181112002637.GD3056@worktop>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:26:37 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Init early callchain for bts event
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 07:16:50PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Vince reported crash in bts flush code when touching the
> callchain data, which was supposed to be initialized
> as an 'early' callchain data.
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000
> ...
> It was triggered by fuzzer by can be easilt reproduced by:
> # perf record -e cpu/branch-instructions/p -g -c 1
>
> The problem is that bts drain code does not initialize sample's
> early callchain data and calls perf_prepare_sample with NULL
> sample->callchain, even if it's expected to exist via
> __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY sample type bit.
Not sure that is the actual problem, nor that this:
> @@ -612,6 +614,9 @@ int intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer(void)
>
> perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, event->hw.last_period);
>
> + if (event->attr.sample_type & __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY)
> + data.callchain = &__empty_callchain;
> +
> /*
> * BTS leaks kernel addresses in branches across the cpl boundary,
> * such as traps or system calls, so unless the user is asking for
is the right fix.
If you look at commit:
6cbc304f2f36 ("perf/x86/intel: Fix unwind errors from PEBS entries (mk-II)")
Then the right fix would be to do perf_callchain() from the BTS drain
code -- if '/p'.
Because prior to that commit, we would do a perf_callchain() in
intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer()'s call to perf_prepare_sample(), which
would do an actual stack unwind for a branch entry.
With your patch, we get an empty stack for every entry.
Which is a change in behaviour...
Now arguably, this is really stupid behaviour. Who in his right mind
wants callchain output on BTS entries. And even if they do, BTS +
precise_ip is nonsensical.
So in my mind disallowing precise_ip on BTS would be the simplest fix.
Hmm?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists