linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 194/361] f2fs: fix to recover cold bit of inode block during POR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181111221647.732727870@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:19:01 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 194/361] f2fs: fix to recover cold bit of inode block during POR

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

commit ef2a007134b4eaa39264c885999f296577bc87d2 upstream.

Testcase to reproduce this bug:
1. mkfs.f2fs /dev/sdd
2. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
3. touch /mnt/f2fs/file
4. sync
5. chattr +A /mnt/f2fs/file
6. xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fsync"
7. godown /mnt/f2fs
8. umount /mnt/f2fs
9. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
10. chattr -A /mnt/f2fs/file
11. xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fsync"
12. umount /mnt/f2fs
13. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
14. lsattr /mnt/f2fs/file

-----------------N- /mnt/f2fs/file

But actually, we expect the corrct result is:

-------A---------N- /mnt/f2fs/file

The reason is in step 9) we missed to recover cold bit flag in inode
block, so later, in fsync, we will skip write inode block due to below
condition check, result in lossing data in another SPOR.

f2fs_fsync_node_pages()
	if (!IS_DNODE(page) || !is_cold_node(page))
		continue;

Note that, I guess that some non-dir inode has already lost cold bit
during POR, so in order to reenable recovery for those inode, let's
try to recover cold bit in f2fs_iget() to save more fsynced data.

Fixes: c56675750d7c ("f2fs: remove unneeded set_cold_node()")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> 4.17+
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/f2fs/inode.c |    6 ++++++
 fs/f2fs/node.c  |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -368,6 +368,12 @@ static int do_read_inode(struct inode *i
 	if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode) && !f2fs_exist_data(inode))
 		__recover_inline_status(inode, node_page);
 
+	/* try to recover cold bit for non-dir inode */
+	if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && !is_cold_node(node_page)) {
+		set_cold_node(node_page, false);
+		set_page_dirty(node_page);
+	}
+
 	/* get rdev by using inline_info */
 	__get_inode_rdev(inode, ri);
 
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -2539,7 +2539,7 @@ retry:
 	if (!PageUptodate(ipage))
 		SetPageUptodate(ipage);
 	fill_node_footer(ipage, ino, ino, 0, true);
-	set_cold_node(page, false);
+	set_cold_node(ipage, false);
 
 	src = F2FS_INODE(page);
 	dst = F2FS_INODE(ipage);