[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c665a05b-66fc-6b8a-fa73-1c76885053db@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:48:35 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@...il.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
lennart@...ttering.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] unify the interface of the proportional-share
policy in blkio/io
On 11/12/18 8:45 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> BTW, since this patch series is probably even more useful for older
> than for future kernels, might it make sense to also propose it for
> stable/longterm kernels (provided that such a possibility exists)?
That just not how things work, we don't put different things in
older/stable kernels, it's strictly backports of what we have in
current/newer kernels. Hence it appears to be a dead end right now.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists