[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1542038185.4011.5.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:56:25 +0100
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Correct dma pool for imx-sdma
Hi Robin,
Am Dienstag, den 06.11.2018, 03:40 +0000 schrieb Robin Gong:
> This patch set to correct dma pool used in the commit fe5b85c656bc
> ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: alloclate bd memory from dma pool")
> because all bds should be contiguous in memory in multi bds case
> for sdma, but dma pool can't statify it and cause transfer failure
> then.Thank Lucas for the making things on the right way.
>
> This patch set is v3 based on Lucas's V1/V2, the main refine:
> --fix the issue I reported in V1 but Lucas workaround it by improper
> way in V2.
> --add vchan_synchronize() to kill tasklet in virt-dma internal.
> --refine name: use sdma_disable_channel_async instead of
> sdma_disable_channel_with_delay since no delay indeed for
> device_terminate_all.
> Please refer to below link for more information:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10601111
Thanks for taking care of those. I've tested them on my board and
things seem to work fine for all my use-cases.
I think those patches should get a CC to stable 4.19. I guess Vinod can
add this when applying the patchset.
Regards,
Lucas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists