[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181112160425.GJ4170@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:04:25 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/41] drivers/ipmi: Replace
synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu()
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:38:55AM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 11/11/18 1:43 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >Now that synchronize_rcu() waits for preempt-disable regions of code
> >as well as RCU read-side critical sections, synchronize_sched() can be
> >replaced by synchronize_rcu(). This commit therefore makes this change.
>
> Assuming the above is true, this looks fine to me.
>
> Acked-by: Corey MInyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Thank you!
> Or I can take it in my tree, either way.
I will carry it unless/until I send it upstream (this coming merge
window) or I see it already upstream.
So your choice. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> -corey
>
>
> >Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> >Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
> >Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >Cc: <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>
> >---
> > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> >index 677618e6f1f7..dc8603d34320 100644
> >--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> >+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> >@@ -2187,7 +2187,7 @@ static void shutdown_smi(void *send_info)
> > * handlers might have been running before we freed the
> > * interrupt.
> > */
> >- synchronize_sched();
> >+ synchronize_rcu();
> > /*
> > * Timeouts are stopped, now make sure the interrupts are off
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists