linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: rtc: sd3078: add device tree documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:40:40 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     "long17.cool@....com" <long17.cool@....com>
Cc:     "a.zummo" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        "mark.rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-rtc <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: rtc: sd3078: add device tree
 documentation

On 13/11/2018 00:55:49+0800, long17.cool@....com wrote:
> hello：
> The patch of 4/4 is not used for this modules,  this is my problem.
> 
> I have a question : 
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -16130,6 +16130,7 @@ M: Zoro Li <long17.cool@....com>
> >  L: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
> >  S: Maintained
> >  F: drivers/rtc/rtc-sd3078.c
> > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-sd3078.txt
> > 
> 
> There is no need to list this file here if it is only done to silence checkpatch.
> What does it mean?
> 
> I found that if I didn't add that statement, when I checkpatch,
>  I would get the following warning.
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #16: 
> new file mode 100644
> Can I ignore this warning?
> 

Yes, you can.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com