[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181112191434.z5ufchwele3fl6se@soleen.tm1wkky2jk1uhgkn0ivaxijq1c.bx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:14:34 +0000
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...hadventures.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, yasu.isimatu@...il.com,
rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, malat@...ian.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com,
jglisse@...hat.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, rafael@...nel.org,
david@...hat.com, dave.jiang@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/memory_hotplug: Create add/del_device_memory
functions
On 18-10-15 17:30:31, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
>
> HMM/devm have a particular handling of memory-hotplug.
> They do not go through the common path, and so, they do not
> call either offline_pages() or online_pages().
>
> The operations they perform are the following ones:
>
> 1) Create the linear mapping in case the memory is not private
> 2) Initialize the pages and add the sections
> 3) Move the pages to ZONE_DEVICE
>
> Due to this particular handling of hot-add/remove memory from HMM/devm,
> I think it would be nice to provide a helper function in order to
> make this cleaner, and not populate other regions with code
> that should belong to memory-hotplug.
>
> The helpers are named:
>
> del_device_memory
> add_device_memory
>
> The idea is that add_device_memory will be in charge of:
>
> a) call either arch_add_memory() or add_pages(), depending on whether
> we want a linear mapping
> b) online the memory sections that correspond to the pfn range
> c) call move_pfn_range_to_zone() being zone ZONE_DEVICE to
> expand zone/pgdat spanned pages and initialize its pages
>
> del_device_memory, on the other hand, will be in charge of:
>
> a) offline the memory sections that correspond to the pfn range
> b) call shrink_zone_pgdat_pages(), which shrinks node/zone spanned pages.
> c) call either arch_remove_memory() or __remove_pages(), depending on
> whether we need to tear down the linear mapping or not
>
> The reason behind step b) from add_device_memory() and step a)
> from del_device_memory is that now find_smallest/biggest_section_pfn
> will have to check for online sections, and not for valid sections as
> they used to do, because we call offline_mem_sections() in
> offline_pages().
>
> In order to split up better the patches and ease the review,
> this patch will only make a) case work for add_device_memory(),
> and case c) for del_device_memory.
>
> The other cases will be added in the next patch.
>
> These two functions have to be called from devm/HMM code:
>
> dd_device_memory:
> - devm_memremap_pages()
> - hmm_devmem_pages_create()
>
> del_device_memory:
> - hmm_devmem_release
> - devm_memremap_pages_release
>
> One thing I do not know is whether we can move kasan calls out of the
> hotplug lock or not.
> If we can, we could move the hotplug lock within add/del_device_memory().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Looks good to me, thank you.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists