[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <539bf8ea-b13f-186a-f1c7-71b1eaa63aa7@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:25:02 +0000
From: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"reinette.chatre@...el.com" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
"pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com" <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
"xiaochen.shen@...el.com" <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"rian@...m.mit.edu" <rian@...m.mit.edu>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/13] arch/x86: Rename the RDT functions and
definitions
Boris,
On 11/12/18 11:56 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:27PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> As AMD is starting to support RDT(or QOS) features, rename
>> the RDT functions and definitions to more generic names.
>>
>> Replace intel_rdt to resctrl where applicable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl_sched.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_monitor.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_rdtgroup.c | 10 +++++-----
>> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +-
>> 7 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> As with patch 1, pls fix subject prefix.
>
Ok. Sure.
>> @@ -637,10 +637,11 @@ int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
>> *
>> * For a 35MB LLC and 56 RMIDs, this is ~1.8% of the LLC.
>> */
>> - intel_cqm_threshold = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024 / r->num_rmid;
>> + resctrl_cqm_threshold = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024 /
>> + r->num_rmid;
>
> No need to break that line here.
Without the line break, checkpatch complains for "line over 80
characters". Do you think we can ignore those?
>
> With that addressed and FWIW:
>
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists