[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181113192154.GM4170@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:21:54 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/41] workqueue: Replace call_rcu_sched()
with call_rcu()
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:48:03AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Now that call_rcu()'s callback is not invoked until after all
> > preempt-disable regions of code have completed (in addition to explicitly
> > marked RCU read-side critical sections), call_rcu() can be used in place
> > of call_rcu_sched(). This commit therefore makes that change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Applied all four, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists