linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 44/44] mm: don't warn about large allocations for slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181113054950.77898-44-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:49:50 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 44/44] mm: don't warn about large allocations for slab

From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 61448479a9f2c954cde0cfe778cb6bec5d0a748d ]

Slub does not call kmalloc_slab() for sizes > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE,
instead it falls back to kmalloc_large().

For slab KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE == KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE and it calls
kmalloc_slab() for all allocations relying on NULL return value for
over-sized allocations.

This inconsistency leads to unwanted warnings from kmalloc_slab() for
over-sized allocations for slab.  Returning NULL for failed allocations is
the expected behavior.

Make slub and slab code consistent by checking size >
KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE in slab before calling kmalloc_slab().

While we are here also fix the check in kmalloc_slab().  We should check
against KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE rather than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE.  It all kinda
worked because for slab the constants are the same, and slub always checks
the size against KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE before kmalloc_slab().  But if we
get there with size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE anyhow bad things will
happen.  For example, in case of a newly introduced bug in slub code.

Also move the check in kmalloc_slab() from function entry to the size >
192 case.  This partially compensates for the additional check in slab
code and makes slub code a bit faster (at least theoretically).

Also drop __GFP_NOWARN in the warning check.  This warning means a bug in
slab code itself, user-passed flags have nothing to do with it.

Nothing of this affects slob.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180927171502.226522-1-dvyukov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+87829a10073277282ad1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+ef4e8fc3a06e9019bb40@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+6e438f4036df52cbb863@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+8574471d8734457d98aa@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+af1504df0807a083dbd9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 mm/slab.c        |  4 ++++
 mm/slab_common.c | 12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index aa76a70e087e..d73c7a4820a4 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3675,6 +3675,8 @@ __do_kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node, unsigned long caller)
 	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
 	void *ret;

+	if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE))
+		return NULL;
 	cachep = kmalloc_slab(size, flags);
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(cachep)))
 		return cachep;
@@ -3710,6 +3712,8 @@ static __always_inline void *__do_kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags,
 	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
 	void *ret;

+	if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE))
+		return NULL;
 	cachep = kmalloc_slab(size, flags);
 	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(cachep)))
 		return cachep;
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index fea3376f9816..3a7ac4f15194 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -1027,18 +1027,18 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	unsigned int index;

-	if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)) {
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN));
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
 	if (size <= 192) {
 		if (!size)
 			return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;

 		index = size_index[size_index_elem(size)];
-	} else
+	} else {
+		if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE)) {
+			WARN_ON(1);
+			return NULL;
+		}
 		index = fls(size - 1);
+	}

 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
 	if (unlikely((flags & GFP_DMA)))
-- 
2.17.1