linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 4/4] mm: Remove managed_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1542090790-21750-5-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:03:10 +0530
From:   Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     keescook@...omium.org, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
        minchan@...nel.org, getarunks@...il.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, vatsa@...eaurora.org, willy@...radead.org,
        Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] mm: Remove managed_page_count spinlock

Now that totalram_pages and managed_pages are atomic varibles, no need
of managed_page_count spinlock. The lock had really a weak consistency
guarantee. It hasn't been used for anything but the update but no reader
actually cares about all the values being updated to be in sync.

Signed-off-by: Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h | 6 ------
 mm/page_alloc.c        | 5 -----
 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index e73dc31..c71b4d9 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -428,12 +428,6 @@ struct zone {
 	 * Write access to present_pages at runtime should be protected by
 	 * mem_hotplug_begin/end(). Any reader who can't tolerant drift of
 	 * present_pages should get_online_mems() to get a stable value.
-	 *
-	 * Read access to managed_pages should be safe because it's unsigned
-	 * long. Write access to zone->managed_pages and totalram_pages are
-	 * protected by managed_page_count_lock at runtime. Idealy only
-	 * adjust_managed_page_count() should be used instead of directly
-	 * touching zone->managed_pages and totalram_pages.
 	 */
 	atomic_long_t		managed_pages;
 	unsigned long		spanned_pages;
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index f8b64cc..26c5e14 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -122,9 +122,6 @@
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_states);
 
-/* Protect totalram_pages and zone->managed_pages */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(managed_page_count_lock);
-
 atomic_long_t _totalram_pages __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_totalram_pages);
 unsigned long totalreserve_pages __read_mostly;
@@ -7065,14 +7062,12 @@ static int __init cmdline_parse_movablecore(char *p)
 
 void adjust_managed_page_count(struct page *page, long count)
 {
-	spin_lock(&managed_page_count_lock);
 	atomic_long_add(count, &page_zone(page)->managed_pages);
 	totalram_pages_add(count);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
 	if (PageHighMem(page))
 		totalhigh_pages_add(count);
 #endif
-	spin_unlock(&managed_page_count_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(adjust_managed_page_count);
 
-- 
1.9.1