[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <985f3dff65744a1899cb012cbb3d4156@TWMBX01.aspeed.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:19:46 +0000
From: YC Chen <yc_chen@...eedtech.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
CC: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
YC Chen <yc_chen@...eedtech.com>
Subject: RE: Performance regression in ast drm driver
Sir,
We found the performance will be bad on desktop environment with OpenSUSE15 UEFI installation if remove "arch_io_reserve_memtype_wc".
Regards,
Y.C. Chen
-----Original Message-----
From: dri-devel [mailto:dri-devel-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Jean Delvare
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 8:05 PM
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance regression in ast drm driver
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 16:27:07 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> The following commit:
>
> commit 7cf321d118a825c1541b43ca45294126fd474efa
> Author: Dave Airlie
> Date: Mon Oct 24 15:37:48 2016 +1000
>
> drm/drivers: add support for using the arch wc mapping API.
>
> is causing a huge performance regression for the ast drm driver. In a
> text console, if I call "cat" on a large text file, it takes almost
> twice as much time to be displayed and scrolled completely.
>
> Can you please check that the ast driver portion of that commit is
> both correct and complete?
And in the meantime, what bad will happen if we just revert the ast portion of that commit?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists